MAX-LOG-MAP算法与LOG-MAP算法性能对比

资 源 简 介

简化MAX-LOG-MAP算法与LOG-MAP算法性能对比MAX-LOG-MAP_1024_标准交织_1～3次迭代_grid简化MAX-LOG-MAP算法与门限MAX-LOG-MAP算法性能对比_10次迭代640交织长度

详 情 说 明

In this document, the author discusses the comparison of the performance between the simplified MAX-LOG-MAP algorithm and the LOG-MAP algorithm. Specifically, the comparison is made in the context of the MAX-LOG-MAP_1024_ standard interleaving_1~3 iterations_grid, and also in the context of the comparison of the performance between the simplified MAX-LOG-MAP algorithm and the threshold MAX-LOG-MAP algorithm after 10 iterations with an interleaving length of 640.

The MAX-LOG-MAP algorithm is a popular algorithm used in digital communications and signal processing. It is known for its superior performance in terms of error correction, but it can be computationally intensive. In contrast, the simplified MAX-LOG-MAP algorithm provides a less computationally intensive option with comparable performance.

The author also touches on the importance of interleaving in the context of digital communications. Interleaving is a technique used to mitigate errors caused by burst interference. In this document, the standard interleaving of 1024 and the interleaving length of 640 are used to test the performance of the various algorithms.

Overall, this document provides a detailed analysis of the performance of different algorithms in the context of digital communications and signal processing, highlighting the trade-offs between computational complexity and error correction performance.